Why not register?


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 5:00 pm  Post subject: Which 'A Nightmare On Elm Street 7 New Nightmare' to get?
Reply with quote
User avatar
Offline

The Ancient One
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 10:03 am
Posts: 5034
Location: Norway - Where the polar bears roam the streets
First I had this on my list
A Nightmare On Elm Street 7 - Wes Craven's New Nightmare (1994).avi
then sharereactor posted this
A Nightmare On Elm Street 7 New Nightmare (1994).avi

which I guess is probably the same file with a different hash, since the filesize and biterate are the same..

but then I found this:
A Nightmare on Elm Street 7 - Wes Cravens New Nightmare.avi

and even though the filesize is about 70 mb less (and so is the quality) it clocks in at 1:52 runtime, whereas the others are a mere 1:44! I don't want a cut version! Are the credits cut or something in the other ones?

PS: http://www.imdb.com/Title?0111686 also says it's supposed to be 1:52, although Spud says imdb are usually wrong..

[ Add all 3 links to your ed2k client ]


Top
 Profile  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 5:23 pm  Post subject:
Reply with quote
User avatar
Offline

Site Admin
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 1:35 am
Posts: 19753
Location: En España
They will be from different regions ;)

I'd go for the shreareactor one, simply because if it's on their main page more people will be sharing it (even if it did start out as the wrong hash).

This movie, will not be cut. It doesn't have any scenes that warrent it:

http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classifie ... enDocument

_________________
Mouse nipple for the win! Trackpoint or death!


Top
 Profile  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 5:34 pm  Post subject:
Reply with quote
User avatar
Offline

The Ancient One
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 10:03 am
Posts: 5034
Location: Norway - Where the polar bears roam the streets
thank you!

but what are these extra 8 minuttes then...?


Top
 Profile  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 6:05 pm  Post subject:
Reply with quote
User avatar
Offline

Site Admin
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 1:35 am
Posts: 19753
Location: En España
John_Doe wrote:
thank you!

but what are these extra 8 minuttes then...?


most of it frame rate difference, PAL = 25fps, NTSC = 29.7fps (i always forget what figure it is lol).

That would account for 8minutes easily.

_________________
Mouse nipple for the win! Trackpoint or death!


Top
 Profile  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 7:13 pm  Post subject:
Reply with quote
Offline

The Devil, Probably
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 3:07 am
Posts: 2174
Location: I'm inside of you.
yep,
its cause we ntsc 29.9700 fps user's are naturally smarter, faster, with quicker synapse response from our optical nerves. Yep,we be the master race. I think its due to our diet of twinkiee dinks and ho-ho's, instead of things made from intestines and stomachs boiled in bile.

or,
we liberated the extra 4.9700 frames in our war against antartica. The penguins didnt need them, and we would have gotten around to slaughtering them eventually, anyways.



our resolutions are diffent too. i think ntsc is 352x240 and pal is 352x288. and i think the field refresh rate is different too.

_________________
'You - you monster! Why? Why in God's name do you do these horrible things??!'

'I thought it was obvious, you sillly girl.
I'm a monster. I do monstrous things.'


Top
 Profile  
PostPosted: Wed Apr 09, 2003 7:38 pm  Post subject:
Reply with quote
User avatar
Offline

Site Admin
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 1:35 am
Posts: 19753
Location: En España
monkeysmasher wrote:
yep,
its cause we ntsc 29.9700 fps user's are naturally smarter, faster, with quicker synapse response from our optical nerves. Yep,we be the master race. I think its due to our diet of twinkiee dinks and ho-ho's, instead of things made from intestines and stomachs boiled in bile.

or,
we liberated the extra 4.9700 frames in our war against antartica. The penguins didnt need them, and we would have gotten around to slaughtering them eventually, anyways.



our resolutions are diffent too. i think ntsc is 352x240 and pal is 352x288. and i think the field refresh rate is different too.


The problem is that on your crummy american made tvs, your getting eye cancer :lol: Not like our quality communist televisions. Yes the reason why no1 can program a VCR is because the instructions are in Russian!

Also it's worth noting that PAL has better image and colour quality, and a larger resolution. If your wanting a full cinema experience, cinema's use a frame rate of 23fps, slower than both PAL and NTSC videos.

If you've seen fight club you'll know what's in the extra 4.9700 frames...
:D

_________________
Mouse nipple for the win! Trackpoint or death!


Top
 Profile  
PostPosted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 2:31 pm  Post subject:
Reply with quote
Offline

Blood Sucking Freak
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 5:05 pm
Posts: 213
Location: Sweden
spud.. the source of all answears :wink:


Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


Moderator: Movie Mods

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Frontpage / Forums / Scifi


What's blood for, if not for shedding?