monkeysmasher wrote: |
yep, its cause we ntsc 29.9700 fps user's are naturally smarter, faster, with quicker synapse response from our optical nerves. Yep,we be the master race. I think its due to our diet of twinkiee dinks and ho-ho's, instead of things made from intestines and stomachs boiled in bile.
or, we liberated the extra 4.9700 frames in our war against antartica. The penguins didnt need them, and we would have gotten around to slaughtering them eventually, anyways.
our resolutions are diffent too. i think ntsc is 352x240 and pal is 352x288. and i think the field refresh rate is different too. |
The problem is that on your crummy american made tvs, your getting eye cancer
Not like our quality communist televisions. Yes the reason why no1 can program a VCR is because the instructions are in Russian!
Also it's worth noting that PAL has better image and colour quality, and a larger resolution. If your wanting a full cinema experience, cinema's use a frame rate of 23fps, slower than both PAL and NTSC videos.
If you've seen fight club you'll know what's in the extra 4.9700 frames...