Hacked Off (2004)

ThEdEaDLiVe · **Posted:** Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:51 am **Post subject:**

I think it's great Gorie is back but man those are some oddball sized rips. Yes we've all made mistakes rippen here also but every bit of criticism received does nothing but improve how we rip and the quality of them. It is by no means knocking ya at all. It's just how we help each other improve. It's what makes Dead Donkey great

But you can't understand why they're moved to low quality when one rip is 630mb and the other is 622mb both with one pass DivX

The latter should be moved into this section also if you ask me(Raging Sharks). The High Quality Section should be fit all the standards of just that. High quality. Odd ball filesizes=oddball resolutions=low bits/pixel=low bitrates etc. At least post specs from G-Spot so we can see the resolution used, bits/pixel, bitrate. The High quality section is only fit for the rips that deserve to be there.

DxaKrator wrote:

Quote:

The movie was encoded with 1-pass instead of 2-pass because in the beginning, quantity is very important to us to get started quickly.

That right there is why this should be in LQ.If you can't take critisism then get out of the game.
If you feel you don't want to post here anymore?Fine...so be it....It really isn't going to hurt anybody.Drop your attitude and your ego...either that or don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out...THIS PLACE IS NOT CM'S.We don't tolerate crap like this and is why all our members get along.
This is going in LQ....don't like it?Well that is your issue not ours...It is only fair to the past releasers that actually have read the rules of the site and comprehend what they mean to put this in LQ since that is the standard for the site if it is 1 pass.I would say at this place.....Quality is much more prefered over quantity.

That says it all right there. Especially in the last paragraph -->"It is only fair to the past releasers that actually have read the rules of the site and comprehend what they mean to put this in LQ". If there's one slight bit wrong with our rips they get moved into this section no exceptions. It's not to be considered a slag on the ripper. Just the standards that have been set out by this forum to ensure the best quality rips possible. :wink:

DxaKrator · **Posted:** Tue Jul 26, 2005 2:26 am **Post subject:**

Quote:

The latter should be moved into this section also if you ask me(Raging Sharks).

You're absolutely right... I missed that one. :wink:

BrainEatingZombie · **Posted:** Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:30 am **Post subject:**

Quote:

2) no one said it was crap, that your crap, gorie is crap, the film is crap, etc.

4) ... and in any event, "crap" is not necessarily a bad thing anyway - provided that people know what they're getting and can make an informed decision as to whether or not it's their kind of crap.

Especially true for the bandwidth constrained

BrainEatingZombie · **Posted:** Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:41 am **Post subject:**

Quote:

They will be available from Newzgroups

presumably this is referring to usenet generally rather than newzgroups.com:

"This domain name expired on 06/30/2005 and is pending renewal or deletion."

DxaKrator · **Posted:** Wed Jul 27, 2005 5:20 am **Post subject:**

Hey dude what did you think of torched?Kind of a ball burner ain't it :wink:

BrainEatingZombie · **Posted:** Wed Jul 27, 2005 5:43 am **Post subject:**

Quote:

Hey dude what did you think of torched?Kind of a ball burner ain't it

Very few movies can still make me wince - but the bit around the 29 minute mark with the needles ...

I could feel my face contorting and my mind screaming at me to "turn it off! agh! my eyes! make it stop! make it stop!!!"

... so I had to share it :mrgreen:

DxaKrator · **Posted:** Wed Jul 27, 2005 5:53 am **Post subject:**

Very good

I got this up in the exploit collection.Your right though...there are parts that make my nut sack invert....of course...the wife LOVES the film :roll:

evilmind · **Posted:** Thu Jul 28, 2005 6:10 am **Post subject:**

D. wrote:

Sure people can watch 1-pass dvdrips, but we rather see a 2-pass.
Sure people can watch two 88 year old lesbians getting it on, but we rather see 19 year olds. Or well, most of us probably.

wait a minute, what's interesting on 19 year old lesbians anyway? way too young, 88 sound better to me :twisted:

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm **Post subject:**

No sources:
http://stats.razorback2.com/ed2khistory ... D128F8403D

Has anyone seen one?

George Tatum · **Posted:** Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:41 am **Post subject:**

I missed this one, it's sin666 all over again :mrgreen:

A 2 pass rip should only take between 2 and 3 hours, not excessive to me.

RoTTeN · **Posted:** Mon Aug 01, 2005 11:58 am **Post subject:**

Quality should take priority over quantity every time. We have refused to release our last 4 rips because we reckon we can do them better. One of these was ripped 4 times and we're still not happy with it.

PyNhEaD · **Posted:** Fri Sep 16, 2005 3:40 pm **Post subject:**

Damn!
1pass instead of 2pass? quantity most important than quality?
Well, GORiE rules changed... I was in the group before and we tried to get elite group but most of the rips were bad (nuked on every dupechecker) lol.
And a few weeks ago, one of my friend asked me to join the group....
Happy to be still PYNHEAD hehe...
Tell me what is the big difference between ripping 1pass and 2pass?
Time? man, it takes me 2-3 hours to rip a dvd from the beginning till the end (ripping the dvd --> making a NFO) !!!
So plz, if you dont want to make a minimum quality rip, just let other groups or ppl ripping them for you...
First time GORiE splited, it was cauz of the quality of the rips, so think about that...
And GORE-E rlsed some 2cd rips with AC3 so why that now....???
Strange attitude in my opinion...

Hacked Off (2004)

Who is online