monkeysmasher
they were on my host.
not on forums

graag
where guy is coming in bathroom.. with yellow sperm. lol.

ah, i didnt know, and i wasnt sure if this forum was anti-porn, i just vaguely remember something like that. it wouldnt bother me if you posted picture of grandma's slurping up cream corn out of a hippo's rectum, i would just prefer a warning on the link. i didnt see the original so i got no room to judge(that usually doesnt stop me anyways:) but by the responses, it was probably pretty nasty.

Someone PM me the ed2k link PLZ, mule throws up a few matches and I wanna make sure I get the right one. Damn I love fucked up movies.

ehh.. ok. I'm not exactly sure what the bottom line is here, but if I did violate the rules in posting the link, I'm truely sorry. as I said in the original post, I was just shocked at how disgusting this movie was. it was not only the nudity that made me feel that way but also the atmosphere, plot and general age of the actors. I guess that's what the makers wanted, but still I don't see any punchline/point/sarcastic-social-comment other than 'this is revolting' and that made it all meaningless to me.

If I remember correctly Clark has been accused of pedophelia before because of some of his photos I think (he used to be a photographer) but as 'Kids' was a brilliant film IMO I then dissmissed those accusations. With 'Ken Park' however I can't say I'm sure anymore. As I see it there were no need for all those scenes to be real and as graphic as they were, and that makes it just plain kiddie porn.

As most know Pasolini was killed by one of his actors from Salo and to be honest, I wont be shocked if Clark has a somewhat similar fate.

John, clark said that he did not want to move camera away from such scenes cuz that would be lie. he said @i wanted to show all how it is. and sex heals them, that why i made them fuck 3some at the end, cuz such kids can be happy in the future only if thez will help each other.. that why thez fuck together (help. c. Clark)@
and he said all those stories r real. and he even know some persons. hey, they r really underaged?!
it"s really kid porn? u mean. girl under 18 suck boy under 18?!
ffs... :x
just read one internet paper... in russia, one of the biggest chanell is going to show this movie without any cuts tomorrow...
heh... jerks...

Nothing to do with censorship. As long as something is posted within the rules and guidelines it is fine, I don't care what people watch and if you've ever seen my posts about people trying to censor over at filenexus (lost in one of the many database crashes) you'll no how much I'll stick films like Faces of Death despite my indifference to them.

I suppose it's a vague rule, and most stuff is allowed Ilysa and what have you is kind of like softcore, and lots of horror involves nudity which is fine, but that film seems to be flat out pr0n, and nothing to do with horror.

For that reason, the topic was deleted because it was porn and not horror. No porn releases on the board. That's all If you think I've judged it wrong, then you can pm me and clarify why it isn't pr0n, and if you make a convincing case I'll let it be reposted.

i was very amused when i saw on imdb rating..
R.. not X

with all the ref's to kids and porn, i wouldnt be surprised to see it reprinted on the RIAA website cause they say p2p is the cause of kid porn and everything bad. might as well rename this board to RIHH (well, another home).

the notion of kid porn makes me ill, I can't believe the RIAA tried to pin that shit onto p2p programs.

They will try to pin all the fucked up and bad shit on P2P. They are gonna do whatever they can to kill it. Makes sense really cos many parents still think P2P is just about music, as soon as they hear that kiddy fiddlers and the like use it to they are gonna want to protect the skids.

Most parents are blinded, still, to technology and it does not occur to them that the internet is a far, far worse place than P2P, and they still let the skids use chatrooms and the like. they just assume their skids are smart enuff, a good example is my step daughter who is 13, ask her what not to do on a chatroom and she will recite the usual, no phone numbers, email address, where ya live, etc, and yet within 2 minutes she was telling ppl where she lived, cos she thought they sounded nice, despite us telling her kiddy fiddlers pretend to be nice teeneagers etc....

dont think so... to complicated...
well. they dont look like "kids". i myself got first gf at 16...
but who know what will be tomorrow.. so must be strict rules against childs porn.
and if acters r under 18 - fook Clark and fook ri44.

if u want to get the mass majority on your side, make your opponent into as disgusting lowest type of monster, accusing them of being a paedo would be it. a regular person just being accused of child fiddling would be screwed(not litteraly), even if they were found innocent, people would always wonder and hold them in suspicion. haha, test my theory at home, accuse a random person, or better yet your neighbour(so when the police arrest him you can take all his stuff)! works for the RIAA, now it can work for you!


all the peoplesheep who dont pay too close attention to what really happening only hear 'god bless the riaa and thier righteous fight against child abuse from p2p's evil!' and shit from whats filtered thru fox news. baaaaaaaaaaaa

Just yesterday I (re)watched a South Park episode - then one with the 'M' word that put all adults in prison.

Remembered what I forgot to post above:
Before this stuff becomes too hot to handle - please, don't judge a movie if everything that you saw of it was a picture of a penis. You can watch it legally if you're old enough and you're not Australian. Or if you don't want to see it, you can still inform yourself by reading about it. And maybe check if "acters r under 18" before "fooking Clark and RIAA"

I agree with msmaher - there's a lot of mass hysteria around children molestantion and there's a lot burning for everyone that is even suspected to be involved with it. Of course those that are guilty of it deserve to burn on it, but only they and nobody that is innocent. Regarding accused artist and their art: should we burn all Polanski's movies because of a presumed rape?

I'm not trying to defend child molesters (I'm a parent and I'm trying to be a good one), rapists etc. - I'm just trying to say "Think before you act".

graag.
yeah sorry for fook Clark. but ri44 fook anyway
i mean i dont see a point.
u wanna show life of teens?
ffs! so many problems! granddad and mom who loves u. u gonna kill them.
or every boy of age 16-17 is blowed by his father?!
what he wants to show using REALLY UGLY ACTORS HAVING SEX?!
he wants to make us sick? kewl. he made that! 100% but . but . butt (:lol:) when u r growing up u understand that in most cases your parents were right... u was jerk. and those probs between parents and children r very old.. very..
and Clark made YET ANOTHER ONE MOVIE ABOUT that...
all i want to say - ohgodnotanotherone!
and again - imho.
that movie DONT SHOW any new ideas or sumthing like that.
it's old like world. and yet another flick?
again - ohgodnotanotherone.
graag. all is IMHO and i respect your point of view.

To a certain extent I have to agree that kiddie porn is Widely available on the p2p progs.Just run a search for porn on your mule..watch what you come up with.I am sure progs like Kaazaa are even worse.Kind of hard to balance the privacy thing with the censorship thing when you look at those results.I really don't think they can do anything about it...seems that stuff will always float around out there amoungst NAMBLA members,Catholic Archdiocese's and the R. Kelly supporters.

99% of it is fake though, or at least the stuff like "12 year old lblowz dad" has alternate name of silvia saint does buffalos or whatever. I think its nasty that people search for 12 year old, 13 year old, etc. but it's normally adult sites trying to get some hits. I'm glad it is mostly fake though and I think the actual amount of child porn, certainly on ed2k is very low. Direct Connect hubs ban you and rightly so if you share stuff involving child pornography, simply by filenames. This gets you banned for stuff that isn't even related but I think any measures is good measures. I'm not saying the shit isn't on the networks, but I am saying it is hugely overstated in it's prominance on a network. RIAA have proven themselves to be arseholes once again. Censorship isn't really to with it, it is illegal because a breech of human rights was commited in the production of anything that involves underaged sex, and all those involved in its production is guilty and will be prosecuted of rape if they are caught. Censorship would be banning a 18/16 year old pretending to be underaged.


I guess the RIAA don't know about "honour amongst theives"

Anyways, about the subject of this topic --> no porn on the board. Graag pm'd me explaining what it is and showed it isn't exactly porn, but it certainly isn't horror so the case for it being posted doesn't hold much weight.

omfg... Ken Park is a hell of a sick movie!
I paused it 4 times, because I couldn't handle it... I don't wanna spoil anything from this "beautiful" masterpiece, but the scene with that guy who masturbates with a sheet around his neck, listening to girls who are playing tennis.. J33z!!! *nauseate*
There are plenty of "nice" parts in this film..
Long live Larry Clark..

Btw, Have anyone seen "bully".. I kind of liked that movie.. It had a plot.. maybe that's why...

i think it's nasty i SOMEpeople check videos with names "12 year old lblowz dad".

sometimes happens shit...
was several time when i was getting some files from those ratio-ftp.. and got not videoclipz with music but real childs pr0n.. of coz i deleted it.. but it's fooked up. and one time got on CD (in my native country u can get any cd, porn , warez for 3$) from one asshole who said - about 10000 pics of girls (18 and older of course) and waht i saw? there were kids...
i understand that mens like young girls... but... 10-14.. it's sick.

izac
yeah..and i dont know why.. but color of his "juice" just maked me sick in 1 sec...