Finnish Parliament approved today a controversial new copyright legislation, based on European Union's Copyright Directive (EUCD). The legislation sparked enormous opposition from worried citizens, but despite the public critique even in mainstream media, the parties currently in coalition government decided to approve the legislation without further modifications.

Legislation has several confusing details and extremely badly worded chapters, making it one of the most draconian versions of EUCD in Europe. Once Finland's president (who has right to veto the law, but the right is used extremely rarely) approves the legislation, it will come into effect, typically within few months.

As Finland has traditionally enjoyed quite relaxed copyright legislation, the change is dramatic. Previously, copying for own personal use (whether you owned the CD/DVD/book/whatever) was perfectly legal and the authors were compensated by blank media levy. Now, the blank media levy will remain in place, but at least the following things will change:

Circumventing copy protections, even for personal use, will be illegal. (it states so in the law, even tho the government tried to argue that the right wont be pursued by government, but nothing stops record labels, movie studios, etc to do so)
Distributing (even for free) tools (whether physical devices or software) that allow circumventing copy protection mechanisms will be illegal. (this includes DVD rippers, tools that allow copying copy-protected CDs, etc)
Advertising tools that allow circumventing copy protection mechanisms will be illegal. (and the law doesn't state how advertising is determined. So, basically simply linking to a page that has DVD ripper downloads from your own site can be considered "advertising")
Possession of tools that allow circumventing copy protection mechanisms will be illegal. Even for personal use.
Guides on how to circumvent copy protection mechanisms can be considered as "tools" and thus are also illegal.
Worryingly, even "organized discussion" on how to circumvent copy protection mechanisms, will be illegal. (and no, Finland doesn't have similar to American Supreme Court that determines whether laws are against constitution, but when laws are approved, they by default are in harmony with constitution and can't be later overturned on basis that they are un-constitutional)

Ironically, Finnish education minister, Ms. Tanja Karpela, argued that "only 1 percent of current music CDs include copy protection mechanisms", thus making the legislation invisible to users. However, she forgot to mention that virtually 100 percent of DVDs do have copy protection and therefor the former right to backup and copy DVDs will disappear. Also, by using at least some level of logic, one can assume that once breaking copy-protection mechanisms will be illegal, most new CDs will feature such mechanism.

So, basically -- buy a portable MP3 player and a copy-protected CD. And you can't copy the music from the CD to your MP3 player legally any more, as you'd break law if you circumvent the copy protection mechanism found on CD.

And the whole legislation is quite close to us -- AfterDawn.com is a Finnish company. So, compare the legislation and what you can find from our site and you probably see certain problem there..

I don't think we're breaking the law to use DVD Decrypter, not as far as I know anyway.

This is why politicians should never be allowed an all access pass to make legislation.

Given the amount of corruption and just plain ignorance of the subject, they still have votes on matters without proper consultation.

The courts and a academic debate is surely a better way to get clear and unbias legislation. I question the intelligence of the ministers action in this instance.

I tend to lean mostly towards ignorance.

I fail to see, why anybody should have the right at all to tell me, what I am allowed to do and what not - elected or not, intelligent or not.

Yeah, you and charlie manson will agree on that one i'm sure.

I don't speak german so don't know what that article said, but i didn't know they even took the-realworld.de to court. I was sure i read it was settled out of court.

I would like to see brains and common sense win out, prolly not gonna happen. Look what happened the last time a smart man with plans got in power, WWII.