no, I think sometimes an AR error of that degree is unavoidable, about 5% will be when it looks distorted.
BTW for a 1cd, its ~0.18bits/pixel, 0.22bits/pixel is for a 2cd rip
| www.dead-donkey.com https://forum.dead-donkey.com/ |
|
| Question about horizontal resolution https://forum.dead-donkey.com/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=7664 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | weezee [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Question about horizontal resolution |
I'm about to encode a PAL 16:9 anamorphic interlaced movie. AR on cover is said to be 1.85:1. The movie is 99 min long. To stay inside 702 Mb and keep a [bits/(pixel*frame)] value of at least 0.22, I have to choose a resolution that has more than 2% of AR error. The only way to keep closer to 0% is to dramatically drop resolution down to 384x208. This is unacceptable to me. So I've tried to change horizontal W-Modul in GordianKnot to 16: this way I can choose 560x304 with 0.199 [bits/(pixel*frame)] and a 0.3% AR error. But I've read in Spud's Tips and many other faqs that it's better to keep W-Modul at 32 to avoid software resizing and horrible artifacts. Is there any solution to this? Is 2.2% AR error too high? Keep in mind that I want to release this movie and keep it stand-alone friendly. |
|
| Author: | spudthedestroyer [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
no, I think sometimes an AR error of that degree is unavoidable, about 5% will be when it looks distorted. BTW for a 1cd, its ~0.18bits/pixel, 0.22bits/pixel is for a 2cd rip
|
|
| Author: | weezee [ Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:33 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | |||
Allright, then it's always better to stay with W-Modul at 32. Thanks
Can you explain this? You mean for 1cd it's better to have AT LEAST 0.18, or that for 1cd it's BETTER to have 0.18 than 0.22+ ? |
|||
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| What's blood for, if not for shedding? | |