for the cash flow
| www.dead-donkey.com https://forum.dead-donkey.com/ |
|
| 28 Weeks Later https://forum.dead-donkey.com/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=14691 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | John_Doe [ Sat May 05, 2007 3:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | 28 Weeks Later |
Anything to hope for, or just another scheme to cash in with a sloppy sequel? |
|
| Author: | wicker man [ Sat May 05, 2007 9:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
for the cash flow
|
|
| Author: | spudthedestroyer [ Sat May 05, 2007 1:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I hear the americans are in it to save the day 
Sounds like Reign of Retards 2. |
|
| Author: | johnathome [ Sat May 05, 2007 2:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I enjoyed the first one so i was hoping this would be good, guess i'll be disappointed 
|
|
| Author: | spudthedestroyer [ Sat May 05, 2007 2:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I also hear that dog soldiers 2 the americans come to save the day... Sounds like Reign of Retards 3 
|
|
| Author: | bipbop13 [ Sat May 05, 2007 7:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'm sure it will be a fun sequel. The virus had to move somewhere......why not to us crazy americans  
|
|
| Author: | ^Rogue^ [ Sat May 05, 2007 9:12 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | |||
It wouldn't even change that much, would it? 
Sorry, couldn't resist.
|
|||
| Author: | bipbop13 [ Sat May 05, 2007 10:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
|
|
|
| Author: | johnathome [ Sun May 06, 2007 10:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Just read a review in one of the sunday papers, and they reckon it's excellent and leaves it open for another sequel, roll on 28 months later 
|
|
| Author: | Truba [ Sun May 06, 2007 10:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
28 years later 28 decades later 28 centuries later 28 mileniums later 28 eons later
|
|
| Author: | perkin2000 [ Sun May 06, 2007 11:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
28 fuggin' films later... Do hope it's good though. |
|
| Author: | DropDeadFred [ Mon May 07, 2007 3:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Just saw the trailer on TV. It looked good but, we all know how trailers can be. |
|
| Author: | MisfitsSamhain31 [ Mon May 07, 2007 10:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think it's looking pretty good and will definitely see it. I wasn't much of a fan of the first, so it can't be much worse than that. From seeing the trailers and some clips, I'm thinking it already looks better. |
|
| Author: | spudthedestroyer [ Mon May 07, 2007 11:04 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | |||
Famous last words
|
|||
| Author: | johnathome [ Mon May 07, 2007 11:40 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | |||
Good god man, i thought that was super! |
|||
| Author: | spudthedestroyer [ Mon May 07, 2007 11:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
well i can see his point, it wasn't exactly as high a calibre as Dog Soldiers, or whatever. It was a bit long, actiony and a bit sentimental/wishy-washy in places. I enjoyed it, but it could have been a lot better 
|
|
| Author: | johnathome [ Mon May 07, 2007 11:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I agree with you that it wasn't as good as Dog Soldiers, but it just seemed so fresh to me 
|
|
| Author: | Lux Delux [ Tue May 08, 2007 1:48 am ] | ||
| Post subject: | |||
If you look at it that way, Uwe Boll is quite a refreshener himself
|
|||
| Author: | MisfitsSamhain31 [ Tue May 08, 2007 10:27 pm ] | ||
| Post subject: | |||
Don't get me wrong, I did like the movie. Like you said, it was fresh, but it just didn't execute on all levels for me. |
|||
| Author: | perkin2000 [ Wed May 09, 2007 3:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hope to be going to a late showing on Fri (The UCI in Sutton, Surrey. UK, If anayone's in the area. I'll be the drunk one with the fat guy and the chap with the staring eyes) My hopes are high, but expectations are honestly quite low. I'll let you know what I thought. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| What's blood for, if not for shedding? | |