www.dead-donkey.com
https://forum.dead-donkey.com/

Shit! They've done it again! Another remake....
https://forum.dead-donkey.com/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=3519		 Page 1 of 4
Author:  spudthedestroyer [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 4:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Shit! They've done it again! Another remake....
The cool Vincent Price movie, House of Wax (1953), is being remaked... wait for it... starring Paris Hilton :roll:


http://imdb.com/title/tt0397065/ :roll: If this one sucks ass, which is a 98%, I'm going to be pissed... again :roll:
Author:  Purple.Nightmare [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 4:12 pm ]
Post subject: 
yet another classic that'll probably suk as a remake. vincent price is unreplaceable!
Author:  paul-scream22 [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 4:14 pm ]
Post subject: 
And I bet they won't do it in 3D either.

BASTARDS :rage:
Author:  avatar [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 4:32 pm ]
Post subject: 
sometimes i think that in the movie as well as in the music business there aren't any new ideas anymore. just look at the amount of books which become movies. i don't know how many (but a loooooooooooot) movies are based on books. or as we have it here on older movies. that really pisses me off. :evil:

well, at least elisha cuthbert is cute. :roll:
Author:  d0c [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:15 pm ]
Post subject: 
thats it!! i will go kill the director this time!!!! :eatthis:
Author:  spudthedestroyer [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:17 pm ]
Post subject: 
paul-scream22 wrote:
And I bet they won't do it in 3D either.

BASTARDS :rage:


no we'll no doubt have the straight to shit-development-house under EA PS2/XBOX/GCN/PC game :lol:
Author:  Polityk [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 10:54 pm ]
Post subject: 
Shit, why the hell do they want a remake of this one? It's not even very popular...

Anyway, I think this is a huge misunderstanding. A remake of Vincent Price movie... What is the world coming to...? :roll:
Author:  spudthedestroyer [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 11:19 pm ]
Post subject: 
then again, cronenberg's The Fly rocked!

The reason I'm thinking this is a bad idea is because there's nearly zero chance they will make a better film than the original. Which is a really enjoyable film.
Author:  paul-scream22 [ Fri Apr 02, 2004 11:54 pm ]
Post subject: 
spudthedestroyer wrote:
paul-scream22 wrote:
And I bet they won't do it in 3D either.

BASTARDS :rage:


no we'll no doubt have the straight to shit-development-house under EA PS2/XBOX/GCN/PC game :lol:
Yep that is guarenteed!

I can't decide whats worse really?

A remake or a sequeal of sorts?

Is it worse to have House of Wax (2004) or House of Wax 2

They're both shite probably.

But goes for all these movies being remade.

Although I'm kinda looking forward to Starship Troopers 2 (fingers crossed!)
Author:  spudthedestroyer [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:10 am ]
Post subject: 
i'd say a sequel would be better, even the greatest films can have crap sequels. A remake is just degrading though.

That said, The Fly (1986) rocked :)
Author:  paul-scream22 [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:17 am ]
Post subject: 
spudthedestroyer wrote:
i'd say a sequel would be better, even the greatest films can have crap sequels. A remake is just degrading though.

That said, The Fly (1986) rocked :)

I agree 100% . The Fly was spot on and i didn't minf Fly 2, but more from a special effects point of view. Was very impressed with the level of gore/sfx in it........

Or at least take the concept and rename it!!!
Like Chateau of Melty Stuff :P
Author:  lostintown [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:19 am ]
Post subject: 
If its crap we'll forget it along with the rest of the world.
Author:  spudthedestroyer [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:22 am ]
Post subject: 
sounds too french for my liking!

:lol:

How about:
Jaume Serra' s "The house of bad things that happen to stupid people who snoop around, but they are going to look, so you might as well watch these stupid bitches, that are two pretty to be opening doors without butler jeaves let alone wandering around by themselves, or watch what's on the other side, I don't mind Warner Bro's paid me up front and some director already made this film so I was on easy street directing this film."
Author:  paul-scream22 [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:28 am ]
Post subject: 
Spud I have four words for you............................

HOUSE OF THE DEAD :oops:

Think of that and maybe, just maybe all these abominations won't look so bad.

Or maybe not?

In fact I just got so enraged about how crap HOTD was I just wana :eatthis:
Author:  spudthedestroyer [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:36 am ]
Post subject: 
lol yeah but that was hilarious... like the flashback to the boat. lmao! I was laughing out loud at that.
Author:  paul-scream22 [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:41 am ]
Post subject: 
But I have to say if elisha cuthbert's in it then I'm tempted to see it :?
Author:  d0c [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 2:38 am ]
Post subject: 
spudthedestroyer wrote:
i'd say a sequel would be better, even the greatest films can have crap sequels. A remake is just degrading though.


yeah a sequal is better than a remake but..... do they listen noooo...
Author:  Chadman [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 2:49 am ]
Post subject: 
A sequel is better than a remake, but that's like saying "Its better to be hit in the groin with a bat, than to be shot in the groin." Either way, its gonna hurt.
But who knows? We've seen a few decent to great remakes in the horror field. The Fly, The Thing and TCM all jump to mind.
Author:  spudthedestroyer [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:28 am ]
Post subject: 
TCM remake great????? Erm, the one i watched was pretty crap :o You sure you didn't watch the original twice by accident?
Author:  monkeysmasher [ Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:42 am ]
Post subject: 
say, another england/british question i have while i was reading this.

do you guys actually name your children things like 'Jeeves/Jeaves'?
i was wondering about that since spuds post above with jeaves the butler, if you people still named your kids 'jeaves' that wouldnt leave many job oportunities open.
Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC [ DST ]
What's blood for, if not for shedding?