In Hell I Burn Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 9:44 pm Posts: 413 Location: The Netherlands
What bullshit (as usual in such cases) this is. What if there were no violent porn, or no porn at all. What would the people watching it do? Violent porn probably satisfies the needs of many 'fetishists' so if it weren't available, wouldn't it be easy to understand that there would be more victims if this is harder to get/find?
They should ban idiotic nosy old women like this. Typical example of political correctness.
BTW: Is this 'violent porn' really forbidden (in the UK)? Why? It's not harmful to the actors, and it's not real. What's the problem?
Site Admin Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 1:35 am Posts: 19778 Location: En España
violent porn won't get past the censors no, but the government doesn't do anything against the internet or ownership. The proposal is that you'll be treated as a criminal if you own it.
Another instance of governments not working for the people but against them. Governments should be afraid of the people
_________________ Mouse nipple for the win! Trackpoint or death!
Dead But Dreaming Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:34 am Posts: 282 Location: Behind the lead pantomimer
One response from the second link you posted....
Quote:
If a killer who enjoyed looking at images of fish, and then proceeded to murder someone with a pirahna, force the government to ban anyone else from ever looking at fishes?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
