Swamp Zombies (2005)

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:13 am **Post subject:** Swamp Zombies (2005)

IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0439309/ wrote:

A chief physician (Shannon Solo) at a large metropolitan hospital is formulating a serum to resurrect recently deceased "patients".When his facility comes under inspection from the federal government, the doctor is forced to dispose of the "patients" as quick as possible even though they are in mid-experiment and he doesn't know if his serum even will work. With the help of the evil hospital operations manager (Jasmin St Claire), he manages to ditch the experiments in the neighboring swamplands. Little do they know, their serum works, the experiments rise to "life" and wreck havoc on a group of students conducting science experiments at the swamplands. With the help of a swamp hermit (Brian "blue meanie" Heffron), a beautiful innocent bystander (Pamela "transformed" Sutch), a park ranger (leon south), and the police captain (dan "the beast" severn) they try to piece together what has gone on....as well as survive!

1h 54mn
576 x 320 (1.800:1)
23.976 fps
705 Kbps
MPEG-1 Audio layer 3, 2 channels
128 Kbps 48 KHz

Goes blocky on high motion as you can see.

ed2k: Swamp.Zombies.2005.STV.DVDRip.XviD-DOMiNO.avi [696.34 Mb] [Stats]

DxaKrator · **Posted:** Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:11 am **Post subject:**

I know this one is going to suck but I just have to click it to find out how bad :lol:

tenorbass · **Posted:** Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:12 am **Post subject:**

Im clicking! Nice boobs :mrgreen:

BadBugs · **Posted:** Sun Jun 24, 2007 6:18 am **Post subject:**

hehe, nice watermarks mr spudvich :mrgreen:

wargand · **Posted:** Sun Jun 24, 2007 8:48 am **Post subject:**

DxaKrator wrote:

I know this one is going to suck but I just have to click it to find out how bad :lol:

Yeah, need something to complain about....again.

But who know? Sometimes I am wrong and I find a little pearl.

Slayer · **Posted:** Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:33 pm **Post subject:** Re: Swamp Zombies (2005)

spudthedestroyer wrote:

Goes blocky on high motion as you can see.

Is that a lot? Or only a few times?

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Sun Jun 24, 2007 3:07 pm **Post subject:**

BadBugs wrote:

hehe, nice watermarks mr spudvich :mrgreen:

lmao, i found a watermarking program and thought... screw it, this one already looks like ass :lol:

lets ass it up more. Made sure they were pngs though rather than my usual jpgs

Slayer · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 3:59 pm **Post subject:** Re: Swamp Zombies (2005)

Slayer wrote:

spudthedestroyer wrote:

Goes blocky on high motion as you can see.

Is that a lot? Or only a few times?

I'll re-ask: does the film do that a lot, going blocky, or only on a few occasions?

wargand · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:23 pm **Post subject:** Re: Swamp Zombies (2005)

Slayer wrote:

spudthedestroyer wrote:

Goes blocky on high motion as you can see.

Is that a lot? Or only a few times?

I'll re-ask: does the film do that a lot, going blocky, or only on a few occasions?

This is not the right question. This is a zombie flick, so he right questions is: Does it go blocky enough and often enough.

Slayer · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 5:24 pm **Post subject:**

OMG, wargand goes humorous. What's this world coming to? :twisted:

BadBugs · **Posted:** Tue Jun 26, 2007 7:39 pm **Post subject:** Re: Swamp Zombies (2005)

Slayer wrote:

spudthedestroyer wrote:

Goes blocky on high motion as you can see.

Is that a lot? Or only a few times?

Its not too bad. Sounds in sync & its been deinterlaced but it looks like it was ripped with 1 of those crappy 1 click rippers.
Its got boobs, blood, gore & zombies & some wannabe kung fu superloser.
Just flicking through so as to answer your question had me giggling. In 1 scene where he's pathetically fighting off a group of zombies, he does what can only be described as a forward roll then punches a zombie in the balls which then proceeds to grab them & fall over backwards in pain. Hmmmmm :lol:

Slayer · **Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 8:15 pm **Post subject:**

In my eMule this film has a tag "Invalid/Corrupt/Fake". Do they mean the blocky thing or are they trying to tell me something different? (Comments only state which eMule is the best according to poster)

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:03 pm **Post subject:**

It does it throughout on high motion, its a result of the extremely low bitrate used. They should have really shrunk the resolution to get around it and i'm not convinced they did a two pass.

It is not a fake though, i downloaded it from newsgroups.

pure · **Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 9:58 pm **Post subject:**

They probably meant this:

antichrist @ FH wrote:

Code:

[NUKE][ XVID ] Swamp.Zombies.2005.STV.DVDRip.XviD-DOMiNO [49F/696.3MB] is 4 days 44 minutes 52 seconds old. It was NUKED 3 days 19 hours 18 minutes 38 seconds ago with reason: bad.ivtc.

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:46 pm **Post subject:**

ah, i've not watched it but the motion seemed okay... must be combed frames in there.

Thanks for the info.

Phantasm · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 2:30 am **Post subject:**

Slayer wrote:

OMG, wargand goes humorous. What's this world coming to? :twisted:

too much tankard :beerchug:

BadBugs · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:09 am **Post subject:**

pure wrote:

They probably meant this:

antichrist @ FH wrote:

Code:

[NUKE][ XVID ] Swamp.Zombies.2005.STV.DVDRip.XviD-DOMiNO [49F/696.3MB] is 4 days 44 minutes 52 seconds old. It was NUKED 3 days 19 hours 18 minutes 38 seconds ago with reason: bad.ivtc.

Hmmm. I have to disagree with antichrist on this. I watched a good 10 mins earlier after reading that & I failed to see any interlacing problems at all. True its a poor quality rip & the sraight edges look jagged (like a pc game without adding any Anistropic Filtering) but as for IVTC there wasnt anything that I noticed.

fierysky · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 7:25 am **Post subject:**

I can't believe this is almost two hours :lol:

wargand · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 8:16 pm **Post subject:**

Now I watched it (more or less). It is great, I LOVE IT. Too bad your you, Geez. Stay away from it.

Totally unrelated question: Why talk and sound the actors in bad movies like actors on a stage of a cheap theater with terrible acoustics?

Or like 'actors' in a cheap amateur pr0n movie. <-- I have heard, would not know otherwise. :lol:

But of course, this has nothing to do with this movie. It really is great. :mrgreen:

Matool · **Posted:** Thu Jun 28, 2007 9:46 pm **Post subject:**

I don't know if the film is watchable, but those tits are GREAT :matrix:

Swamp Zombies (2005)

Who is online