Well that's just it; its not the concept its the increabily implausable and poorly thought out way some people seem to grasp facts and put them through the wrong shaped wholes, and the interweaving of everything into one neat plot. If there's anything that should be abundantly clear, there's never one neat plot... ie. have you seen titantic?
The concept of global government is obvious and apparant (duh!), that's not whats the issue with the nwo conspiracy. Its the NWO conspiracy bullshit is just utter rubbish. Lets be distinct, the NWO conspiracy is an extreme view on global government that speculates everyones going to be ensalved by cultist elite (eye on the dollar and all that jazz) to do all kinds of nasty stuff (I've heard quelling the population, corporate government, etc.). Its not the obvious Chomsky version of world governance converging, since convergence can be seen without any looking. It becomes apparant by looking at the difference between administrations (most apparant in domestic policies) they are just doing everything reactionarly and for their own needs. The systematic and continual plan by every single office and administration... yeah right, they can't even file papers properally. It's these freaks, what do you do with them? they just gibber on and on and on as if what they're saying is the god's honest truth... i tried Geezus' suggestion and it worked... for a while. I don't even like the tool
As for the fti, rather sad and miguided "brainwashed, ignorant, etc" comments, it became apparant
real fast they'd not even read the topic or at least understood a word in it
That northwood file is always rolled out (and your quite right, it is the us and not the uk, which means it doesn't mean much at all applied to the bombings), and i'm sure everyones read it by now, or at least seen it quoted because its in every 911 documentry (infact the nwo freak i was talking about kept quoting it as he jumped round a centuries worth of history), but its always used to ill effect. Funniest thing i saw was I've seen it used by some fat public access tv american clown that linked it to the illuminati and the nwo, then said that there secret plan was to reduce the population by some drastic percentage (quoting Prince Charles book on environmentalism

), and then went on to 'show' how they were going to attack christians, showing footage of police / army execersives in a town. Then he concluded with the message "keep your guns" in an NRA slogan like stance. Lets just say it was amusing to see his little dot to dot.
When it comes to the moon landing, you can use that to test how suseptable someone is to bullshit I've found. They were never going to do a live feed, what was there, a ten minute buffer + the delay it took to get back to earth? It's impossible with such a distance to have a live feed, i mean look at so called 'live feeds from other countries' with the delays. The actuality of that broadcast is it wasn't live at all, it was impossible to do so, so they obviously went 'what the fuck' and edited it into something watchable... obviously propaganda purposes served. One of the most used 'disproving theories' is that the footage has been edited... er yes, so?

Its amazing how many people think it was live... but then again, its even more amazing how many people think it never happened on even less evidence.
Of course i don't have a [i]CNN[i]
internet poll to 'prove' those
A lot of the time it clearly comes down to just 'rebelling' based on their dislike of government (which is fine, because there's so much to dislike it about), and in the states given the size of government, I'm not surprised these conspiracies appear at all, but its the wrong thing to do, grasp to the fantastical or unsubtantiated. Best way to register distaste is through activism on whats happening (ie. privatisation, corporate involvement, foreign policy, etc.) rather than buying into the fantastical, because it just bites the arguement in the ass. Lets just say i'd be amazed if it turned out they never landed on the moon, given the evidence that shows they quite clearly did far outways the patchwork conspiracy and suggestion they didn't on breadcrums.
When it comes to broadcast tv though, one of the best documentries i've personally seen on fear is from the BBC, and was very well done. It was better researched than most of these fantastical documentries, and didn't fall into the NWO speculator trap of crossing administrations and generalising one person as all people, or generalisation of demographics as if they could bare to be in the same room as each other. The Power of Nightmares i believe it was called.