Why not register?
Author |
Message |
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:09 pm Post subject: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
|
Top |
|
|
Slayer
|
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:10 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:13 pm Posts: 7872
|
Yes, please
_________________
THIRD SEAL MEANS FAMINE
|
|
Top |
|
|
turvey2
|
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:06 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
Blood Sucking Freak Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 7:34 pm Posts: 173
|
Me Too
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 7:05 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
Alrighty then. So be it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Terje
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 3:10 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
Request Territory Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:51 pm Posts: 4
|
oh i realy want to see this movie, looked over like the whole google in search for it ..
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
No problem, it's coming. But it's not going to be my next release.
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 10:43 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
I would do this next. Unfortunately the DVD I have seems to be 1.77:1 - whereas the original AR is 1.85:1 The perfect solution would be that someone rips the 1.85:1 video and I provide the original 5.1 AC-3 English audio. Any volunteers?
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:55 am Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
If you look here: http://www.dvdcompare.net/comparisons/film.php?fid=2292You'll see that every DVD that has the original 1.85:1 AR has only stereo sound (2 channels). Every DVD that has DD 5.1 audio has an AR of 1.77:1. I have a DVD with the second specs. Does anybody have a DVD version with the 1.85:1 AR? Preferably the Italian or French version for they are PAL too.
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 10:29 am Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
Ok, I'll not rip this then.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MCMLXXXVIII
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:14 am Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:40 pm Posts: 2523 Location: In a dark room...
|
elchup, stop worrying about the AR and rip it if you want to.
Many films are reformatted to 1.78 from 1.85 by revealing a tiny amount of picture information top and / or bottom. This is done because it matches the standard TV aspect ratio and is quite normal.
The difference between those ratios is minute, and you're getting more slightly more image with 1.78 (or rather 1.77 in this case) rather than less.
_________________
Last Release: The Food of the Gods (1976) NZB: download/file.php?id=436
Coming Soon: Cat's Eye, The Uncanny, Food of the Gods 2, The Devil's Men, Studio 666.
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:09 am Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
Do you mean that the 1.85:1 version is more cropped than the 1.77:1? Unfortunately 1.85:1 is the original AR and my version looks quite washed out. I would like to see a frame from the 1.85:1 version just to be sure.
|
|
Top |
|
|
elguaxo
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:37 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
Master Of The Dead Donkey Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:01 pm Posts: 708
|
elchupacabra wrote: | Do you mean that the 1.85:1 version is more cropped than the 1.77:1? |
It's as MCMLXXXVIII explained it. I'm sure there are a few exception, but 1.78 has always more picture on movies where the "intended" AR was 1.85.
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:37 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
So I can simply crop it to 1.85:1. I'm still interested in seeing the picture of the 1.85:1 version. Maybe it is better.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MCMLXXXVIII
|
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:58 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:40 pm Posts: 2523 Location: In a dark room...
|
Yeah you could crop it to 1.85 if that's what you prefer, it would make little difference though.
Post a VOB capture and I'll give my opinion on the image quality.
_________________
Last Release: The Food of the Gods (1976) NZB: download/file.php?id=436
Coming Soon: Cat's Eye, The Uncanny, Food of the Gods 2, The Devil's Men, Studio 666.
|
|
Top |
|
|
spudthedestroyer
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:32 am Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
Site Admin Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 1:35 am Posts: 19756 Location: En España
|
I know it was tongue in cheek, but do not make matters worse and overcrop. Its rarely a uniform reveal/hide xyz pixels when matting a movie.
_________________ Mouse nipple for the win! Trackpoint or death!
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:36 am Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
|
Top |
|
|
MCMLXXXVIII
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:15 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:40 pm Posts: 2523 Location: In a dark room...
|
It looks a bit soft but a bit of sharpening should fix that. I reckon it's okay to rip.
_________________
Last Release: The Food of the Gods (1976) NZB: download/file.php?id=436
Coming Soon: Cat's Eye, The Uncanny, Food of the Gods 2, The Devil's Men, Studio 666.
|
|
Top |
|
|
elguaxo
|
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:30 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
Master Of The Dead Donkey Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:01 pm Posts: 708
|
spudthedestroyer wrote: | I know it was tongue in cheek, but do not make matters worse and overcrop. Its rarely a uniform reveal/hide xyz pixels when matting a movie. |
+1 The screenies look ok. Some SeeSaw magic is all you need!
|
|
Top |
|
|
elchupacabra
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:20 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
The Ancient One Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 10:31 am Posts: 3606
|
I got hold on the Region 1 disc. It is also 1.77:1 so that 1.85:1 info on the net is bullshit. I'm going to use the R1 video though, because the image is better/sharper.
|
|
Top |
|
|
elguaxo
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:24 pm Post subject: Re: Cut (2000) |
|
Master Of The Dead Donkey Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:01 pm Posts: 708
|
elchupacabra wrote: | I got hold on the Region 1 disc. It is also 1.77:1 so that 1.85:1 info on the net is bullshit. |
It happens all the time! Many times you can't even trust what's printed on the cover
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|