I think your going about it totally wrong. The problem is the question isn't "should i release AC3 movies?". That's completely the wrong idea. You should be thinking "does
this movie warrant AC3?". The answer in most cases for low budget horror movies, is definitely not. Its a totally waste of bandwidth.
Take the excellent Night of the Living Dead release by avatar for example, someone (satan I think) said it would have been nicer with AC3 for that rip. I'd say that it completely defeats the point. The movie is so old, and low budget that the original mix is nothing special. The remastered mix is nice, but totally unnessacary to compromise the video quality of such a great film. It's an hour and a half, and with AC3, it would probably have had to go to 2cds to maintain the quality its at.
PC_Arcade wrote: |
But, if a movie is mono or stereo, then AC3 is not needed, it's only movies with 5.1 soundtracks that warrant it. |
I'd extend that to *good* 5.1 mixes. Lackluster ones don't really need treated to 2cd releases.
If you can keep the bitrate high, 900+, then go for AC3, if not you are compromising the quality of your rip severely by bumping the size of the audio track up a lot. If its a long movie, don't bother with it unless your doing a 2cd rip.
I would say releasing as a seperate track shouldn't be done either, not if your expecting your rips to stay alive for more than a couple of months
I think emoboy summed it up fine, 1cd rips with AC3 are out of the question
generally, not if you expect quality. You just got to think, does this movie need a 5.1 surround track? For stereo, I'd say don't bother, ditto for mono.
ps. moved to software discussions