It doesn't seem these guys are too happy about Peter Rottentail being available on bt. I had uploaded this on Sn and a few other sites while theNomad put it up on Crazymazy's. theNomad brought this to my attention and like he said it seems kind of odd that he'd be pissed about this when he says he has copied stuff himself. Here's the quote from the site...
| Quote: |
So I found out today PETER ROTTENTAIL has shown up on one of those Bit Torrent DVD-ripping sites. Is it a compliment? An insult? If people like the movie, will they go buy the DVD to get the packaging and the extras? If they don't, will my children be forced to eat cat food?
People say that making bootlegs and burning CDs and so on doesn't hurt people, only corporations, but Mark and John Polonia are real people and so am I (to some extent). I can't take the road of righteous indignation as I have copied a few CDs in my time, and taped shows off of TV back in the day, and maybe borrowed a bit of software here and there, but it does make me think twice.
If you want to see what a microcinema filmmaker would look like if you punched him or her in the stomach, go to a film fest (like I did in Rapid City this summer) and tell them that you liked their movie so much you make 20 copies for all of your friends (substitutue "garage band" and "CD" if you are into that scene).
So is it okay if you only steal from big people? It's a rocky road, ironic as the answers are easy. Nobody should be ripping, burning, taping stuff that is the intellectual property of somebody else, for free. What kind of sea change in the culture would that entail? Just because it would be difficult, does that mean it shouldn't be done? |
Site link
http://johnoakdalton.blogspot.com/
I get a kick how he says "If you don't go out and buy it will his children be forced to eat cat food?" But it's ok for him to copy something for himself as long as it doesn't effect him or anybody else he knows. What a joke!
