i guess you do... click -> HERE!

cheers d0c

for ruining my day with that fantastic image

I haven't had MD for anything but breakfast.

hehehehehe... i guess that was a mouth full one then....

Hmm.

I don't know how I keep clicking on this kind of shit without getting sacked...

funny!!

yeah warning for ppl that dont want to work but do other things when they are payed..... every joke need a warning becouse of danger.... remember next time you see some womans breast it can be more dangerouse than using a signature of someone pulling out eyes of a man... and remember this is where you get your 18 year rated horror movie..... and here you see movies of more death and hate you ever will find in real life... and yet a woman with a salad and cheese between her ass is more dangerouse and horroible than ever and need a warning... yeah the world is sick very sick.... LOL!

there's no need to be a twat, people know what to expect in a release thread

hehe i hope so... but i guess the twats need a warning, before thet dare to click it.....

Common doc, stop being such an ignorant, childish asshole. Wether you or I or anyone else think that seing blood is worse than seing nakedness, is TOTALLY IRRELEVANT!

The fact remains that getting caught with a few pics of splatter effects from horror movies on your computer at work, will most likely only be looked on askew, but not get you fired.

Getting caught with photos of naked/topless/porn/or even women in lingerey ads, will all be looked on the same way: PORNO!!!!. Porn is not accepted in the open public. IT DOESN'T MATTER what the hell you or I think about it. PORN IS NOT ACCEPTED!!! The general view still seams to be that it is exploitation of poor, helpless women, that are mainly "RAPED".

The reason for this might be womens liberation and feminist movement gone too far; that has big buisinessmen harrassed as "Pervert Supporters" just because someone at their firm has a few nude photos on their computer. The managers want to set examples and show that PORN IS NOT ALLOWED AT THEIR WORK.
Or it might be that womens liberation and feminist movements still haven't come far enough for it to be allowed for WOMEN to admit that they are sexual beings, with lusts and desires, just like men say all the time. Therefore, if a woman has sex on film/simply undress/whatever... it HAS to be against her will!!!

THIS IS THE GENERAL VIEW!!! IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU OR I DON'T AGREE WITH IT!!!! YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO CHANGE THE WAY PORN IS CONDEMNED!!!!

You, YES YOU DOC, might get someone in BIG TROUBLE with their supervisor, just because you wanted to post something which (you know!) is actually not allowed.

YOU MIGHT EVEN GET SOMEONE FIRED!!! YES, SOMEONE MIGHT LOSE THEIR JOB BECAUSE OF YOU TRYING TO BE FUNNY!

If you really don't understand this then you're being REALLY stupid.

i understand john but hhah is not a site for childern and my piont is that you dont have to surf this site on work, you have a choice... funny or not its the boss that hired you to do an job and he expect the work to be done, and not having you the employee to surf the web at work... anyway this post was only posted to make ppl have a laugth and maybe make the boring normal day a bit brigther. the post have got its warning now john and dont think about the womens liberation and feminist movement it will only get you excited.... its weekend and time for a ->

Aww come on d0c, are you a manager or something? You really sound like my boss - you're paid to work not surf the internet!! Well when you work a shitty job you take every opportunity you can to do something else.

And you're right I probably shouldn't even be looking at HHAH at work never mind pictures of women with cheese and salad in their ass, but John is right with what he is saying... not that I didn't piss myself when I first read what you'd wrote about our sick sick world My bosses would probably accept the horror things (I'd still get formal warning probably), but pr0n would get me crucified.

As it stands now it looks fixed but to be honest out of the mods I was the one asking about that kind of stuff attatched without a warning label...when I used to work at an office I would go to this site alot and check shit out.If you were to have done that there is spy network that would pick up that sort of shit beeing logged to my comp....It's just thinking about others at the work...I go to my fave sites during break...that is what I would do....My ass would have been canned that is all I know.It is a pretty simple and standard thing...if it is meant to offend like that you should at least say insides offensive so you know to click at home....I am sure countless wives enjoyed that pick too but I wouldn't have ate it.
My advice for anyone worth a controversial topic is running by a mod first and see what their reaction is..it's the smartest and safest way to get anything done...it's not like we're Nazi's here

I think that that's the problem here, d0c's been warned on a number of occasions about posting (and linking to) unsuitable content.
For all of his moral argument about whether or not you should surf the 'net at work (which incidentally I see as none of d0c (or anyone else heres) business) this boils down to common sense, if you know that content is not suitable for work then it should be marked as such.

I wouldn't mind, but it's not even vaguely funny.

Like I said,I wouldn't have ate it...not even with extra cheese :-o