Return of the living dead (1985) (Workprint) (VHSrip)

manzarek · Last edited by manzarek on Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:29 am, edited 2 times in total.

Some interest made me release this anyway:

Return.Of.The.Living.Dead.WORKPRINT.LowQuality.MRM.avi

OBS! Low QUALITY!

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089907/alternateversions

AVI File Details
========================================
Name.........: ROTLD.avi
Filesize.....: 699 MB (or 716,630 KB or 733,829,646 bytes)
Runtime......: 01:49:32 (196,980 fr)
Video Codec..: DivX 5.0
Video Bitrate: 788 kb/s
Audio Codec..: 0x0055(MP3) ID'd as MPEG-1 Layer 3
Audio Bitrate: 96 kb/s (48/ch, stereo) VBR
Frame Size...: 512x384 (1.33:1) [=4:3]

Guldmane · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:09 pm **Post subject:**

Thanks, sounds interesting! :beerchug:

KABAL · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:09 pm **Post subject:**

Thx for this one.

I almost bought it from ebay.

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:13 pm **Post subject:**

the sample is bust. Doesn't play, and nandub spits out an error. Looks like a corrupted upload.

Screenshots are simpler and easier

See No Evil · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2005 8:19 pm **Post subject:**

click!

cheers manzarek, Been wanting to see this one for ages! Don't care too much about the quality, you can't expect too much from an Nth generation VHS tape, dispite people complaining on your original post. nobody can really argue with free can they?

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:13 pm **Post subject:**

Quote:

nobody can really argue with free can they?

Unless its an easily avoidable mistake or something, then its helpful for everyone

I'm not saying there's anything wrong here, but I hear this all the time when someone makes a suggestion or gives advice and you get a "f*ck you its free". Completely misses the point, and is very childish (p2p site moderation means I see it all the time).

err... carry on

See No Evil · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:03 pm **Post subject:**

i take your point spud, and your right, and i don't mean anything nasty by it, i just think people are too quick to complain.

you've released movies, so have i, and people can seem ungreatful sometimes when rippers put alot of work into a release and all they get back is 'this isn't dvd quaility, whats the point in wasting my bandwidth'.

you must have experienced that?

ThEdEaDLiVe · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:21 pm **Post subject:**

Spud is the main guy on here that seems to give everybody advice on these things. You learn way more when somebody says "you could have tried this or that" or "this is how it should/could have been done." He's not being an ass at all about it. He's just trying to help improve how guys rip and post. I for one welcome it EVERYTIME as i learn from other guys rights and wrongs including my own. So i hope he never stops giving advice(where the hell do you store all that info :lol:

)It's not to be taken personal. Hey were all here to help each other out in the end :moon:

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:21 pm **Post subject:**

Well I prefer people to tell me if something is wrong, I don't like time wasting and spreading crap when it can be better. Especially if I've made a mistake, "Thx" x 100 posts aren't as useful as informing me of a mitake.

Of course there are idiots, when one of my releases was put on SR frontpage, some idiot found the thread and went "Too slow Sharereactor! It has been ripped here" then linked to a newer, crappy MPEG2 release :lol:

spudthedestroyer · **Posted:** Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:21 am **Post subject:**

erm thx x100 btw MrM :lol:

None of this has anything to do with this release at all, but you know how topics go here by now :lol:

Purple.Nightmare · **Posted:** Mon Jan 10, 2005 1:29 am **Post subject:**

cheers 4 teh release :beerchug:

Chadman · **Posted:** Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:03 am **Post subject:**

I've got the tape of this. Probably the same quality. Makes for an interesting comparison.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089907/alternateversions

manzarek · **Posted:** Mon Jan 10, 2005 6:26 am **Post subject:**

Been having con problem !
But now seems OK!

video-man · **Posted:** Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:23 pm **Post subject:**

just wondering what your main source of the movie was, was it vhs or vcd.

was vhs badly copied

manzarek · **Posted:** Mon Jan 24, 2005 10:16 pm **Post subject:**

vhs copy I assume! I bought it as such ! and before that dont know some master of some sort or similar!

Chadman · **Posted:** Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:44 pm **Post subject:**

Most likely a few generations removed from the source, same as any other print out there.

evilmouse · **Posted:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 6:11 pm **Post subject:**

Can anyone help with this? been on 72% for ages... just need help finishing it...

fierysky · **Posted:** Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:51 pm **Post subject:**

What's your eMule nick? I don't see you in my queue... let me know and I'll friendslot you.

manzarek · **Posted:** Thu Dec 29, 2005 5:55 am **Post subject:**

I gave you a friendly slot if user: bla are you ; you have a low id though but eventually you will get it

Return of the living dead (1985) (Workprint) (VHSrip)

Who is online